Deuteronomy 26: 16-19 and Luke 10: 1-10, 17 - Sunday, June 28, 2026

 a sermon preached at the final Sunday of our Intentional Interim Ministry at Osoyoos-Oliver... and the final Sunday of the two-point Pastoral Charge.  As of July 1st, Oliver United Church and Osoyoos United Church will each be single-point charges. 

In the fall of 2024, Shannon shared a metaphor that we have kept coming back to throughout our Intentional Interim time together: a Backpack.  Each Sunday since then we’ve seen the backpack on-screen, and the Oliver and Osoyoos sanctuaries have each had a hiking stick up front as a tangible reminder of the journey we are on.

In our mountain years, a backpack was an important companion.  There, we learned that there were certain essentials to bring along on just about any hike: Water, sunscreen, Bear Spray, something to sit upon, extra layers of clothing, a First Aid Kit, Binoculars, and a phone/camera.

This is WAY more stuff than Jesus instructed his first 12 disciples, and the next round of 72 disciples, to take with them as they went off two-by two to carry Jesus’ message of the Good News and the gifts of healing. Jesus told them to only take a walking stick and the shirt on their back- no food or money or bag or even sandals. He told them to accept the hospitality of one household in each town - and if they were not welcomed and their message not heard, to just turn around, shake the dust from their feet and move on to the next community.

In the desert cultures of the Middle East in Jesus’ day, and up to today in the remaining Bedouin communities, the requirement of hospitality is binding, no matter who shows up at your door.  Jesus instructed his disciples to expect and accept that life-saving hospitality. Jesus knew that in the acceptance of hospitality, both the host and the one receiving the gift of hospitality would have their hearts opened. A relationship of trust and kindness would provide a foundation for the Good News and healing to be shared and received.

What I take in my backpack for a hike, frankly, does not expect that I will depend on the kindness and hospitality of strangers: it contains the items to help me cope if I were to become lost, or if the weather changes, or if I develop blisters.  At the beginning of our time together 22 months ago, we considered what might come with us, not in a hiking pack, but in an Intentional Interim Ministry backpack. So today we review how these tools have been used as we have worked on the Five Focus Points of IIM.

As we considered your Heritage, a mirror – to help you see yourselves but also to see what was behind you – and a magnifying glass for closer investigation – assisted our work.  So did our field guide for the journey, the Bible. We heard the stories of the earliest days, when the ditch was just being built, of the pioneer ministers here riding a bike up and down the valley, doing services at Osoyoos and OK Falls with a final service in Oliver, where the Manse was.  We heard about the painful split in 1990, when a sizeable number of people, upset by the Church’s decisions about human sexuality and other implications of progressive theology left both the Oliver and Osoyoos congregations to form their own Church on Black Sage Road, and friends: while that happened before many of you got here, never forget that each of these congregations is the remnant of those who did not leave.  Whether you know it or not, that gives you credibility as you reach out to LGBTQ folks who are seeking a spiritual home.

There were so many conversations full of energy and direction as new possibilities emerged that will shape the new Mission of each congregation.  The Mirror signifies how you saw your reaction to the realities of today, a candle of hope shed light and hope in the midst of so many changes, and a compass symbolizes the necessary information that helped you identify new directions.  These tools will continue to help you stay the course as you experiment with new ways: with new partnerships here in Osoyoos, with a whole new building in Oliver as you join the people at St. Edward’s Anglican who are eager to receive you with hospitality and love.  In both places, fortunately, you understand ministry as a way to engage the community around you, not just something you do to address your own needs, and that will lead you to find ways to utilize the people and resources and facilities at your disposal to meet needs, share love, and be the body of Christ.

In the Interim Ministry backpack, as well as a hiking pack, provisions to help you keep going are essential: water, snacks, clothing to layer up or layer down. As we consider the gifts and tasks of Leadership we admit that the work here often tends to fall on the same shoulders, and you’ll need to watch out for that: there’s only so much that having a sip of water and a snack and layering up and layering down can do, when what you really need is a partner to help with the task at hand.  Still, we have had those things in our backpack and we’ve also had a map:  at the Annual meetings, delving into your stewardship trends, both financial and human, gave encouragement that there is indeed a pathway ahead of each of these congregations, the road has not come to an end.  Yes, we’re aging and no, there’s not as many of us as there used to be, but you have more than one source of income and more than that:  you have a sense that God isn’t done with you yet.  And in our backpack we have a wonderful multi-tool—sort of a combination of a Swiss army knife and compass and light and telescope, and that reminds us of the necessity of knowing the wide variety of available resources, and the adaptability (and humility) to be willing to work with trusted partners beyond our little congregations, who can help you exert Christ’s ministry of welcome in these towns.

And this ties into the tools of Connection- to the community and larger church. We again, begin with our Biblical field guide, reminding us of the two-by-two connection-making of the first disciples, and we also have in our pack a First Aid Kit and a cell phone. This past Monday in Oliver we had a remarkable (and lengthy) meeting, a mixed group of in-person and online, local and Regional, Anglican and United, at which we went through the draft agreement between St. Edward’s Anglican and Oliver United line-by-line.  Present with us were both the Anglican Bishop, Lynne McNaughton, and our United Church Executive Minister, Treena Duncan, along with Doug Goodwin, who was for many years the Executive Secretary of BC Conference.  When we put together the work we had done locally, and the profound support and experience of these representatives of the wider Church, it was so encouraging, and I hope you feel that sense of support from our United Church Region in Osoyoos as well.  When we presented the final report of the Transition Team to the Region, it was received enthusiastically and if you need help navigating the next parts of the journey – or, at times, a tensor for a twisted ankle or a band-aid after a scrape – use that phone in your backpack, send an email, make a phone call, the folks at the PMRC region want these ministries to work and are there to help: folks like Kathy Davies, Shauna Getz, and Lori Megley-Best.  And don’t forget that while you will no longer be a two-point charge, there is a United Church congregation just 20 km away on Highway 97, friends you know, who can lend a hand when needed.

To get a glimpse of the Future—we imagine the use of binoculars, a flashlight, a smartphone to look things up, and, of course, our field guide – the Bible -  to see future possibilities.  You’ve considered a variety of options, have identified callings for Osoyoos United Church and Oliver United Church that are unique to your local situations, the Holy Spirit has shone a light on what is working and what is not.  And we know how much you are looking forward to have your own half-time ministers come to each town to support that future work.  The search process is just beginning, of putting the word out there and, God willing, having just the right person come to each Church as your called or appointed minister, but please remember the work you put into discerning the path God has set before you, and the importance of your prayerful and tangible support of
what comes next.

The journey requires fun that nourishes! Both congregations are blessed with skilled, robust music leadership from pianists who love what they do, and your excellent worship slide presentations on the TV screen invite everyone to join in. There is a sense of camaraderie here, and I know you

will have fun with Steve Hershey and Laura Turnbull and Donald Schmidt on Sundays over the next six months as your ministry search proceeds.

And finally- are the hiking pole and walking stick. For twenty-two months we found our way together, with God, on a journey that has needed wisdom and trust and creativity, a journey that required study and honesty and whatever energy we could muster.  

If you remember back to Sunday, September 15, 2024, when we first packed our hiking pack, the scripture image we used then was the Exodus: a journey into the unknown, with God who would guide and lead and protect.   This morning we read not of arrival at the promised land, an image accompanied by a fair bit of baggage, but rather the directions on what to do as you arrive at the new place God has for you: a ritual of generosity, humility and gratitude.  As a word of advice, periodically – let’s say, every seven days – pause to give thanks for the community and the work that God has given you, people of the United Church congregations in Osoyoos and Oliver, no longer as a two-point charge but as separate communities of faith. Your work is a gift, enacted by your with eyes and ears, hands and hearts wide open to the people around you.  Your journey has not ended, and now you will need to continue your walk along this path that has emerged, and Shannon and I will take our walking sticks and find the journey God has in front of us.

With thanks, with joy, with companions on the journey: may the blessings we know in God, Creator, Christ and Spirit, go with us all.   Amen.

 

© 2026 Osoyoos-Oliver United Church Pastoral Charge, Rev Shannon Mang and Rev Greg Wooley.

Matthew 9:35-10:14 - OSOYOOS - Third Sunday after Pentecost, June 14, 2026

Preached at OSOYOOS UNITED CHURCH

The Jesus of my understanding, is the Word of God made flesh, a person of wisdom and love and courage who repeatedly broke down social and religious barriers. In his words about love of neighbour, and his challenge for us to radically expand our understanding of “neighbour”, Jesus, pushes us to let go of our tendency to label and limit.

In today’s gospel reading, Jesus sees so many vulnerable people around him, “sheep without a shepherd”, and responds by sending out his disciples to proclaim the Kingdom of God, and heal in his name. This, to me, is consistent with the way Jesus usually responds: he sees the need, he commissions helpers to address the need.  But in the midst of the reading is a troubling question:  given his agenda of breaking down barriers, why did Jesus limit the disciples to only go to Jewish towns, not to the Gentiles or Samaritans? This seems contrary to the Jesus I know.

Theologically, the gospel writers like to hearken to Hebrew prophets like Isaiah (49:6) who made clear that the mission of the Messiah would be first to the Jewish people, so that’s part of the reason we see this narrowing of scope in the gospel of Matthew.  This shows up again in our communion prayers, when we trace a continuous “salvation history” from the days of Abraham and Sarah to the mission of Jesus. But from a practical standpoint, in limiting where his disciples are to go, I see Jesus’ compassionate recognition of the personal, spiritual and emotional vulnerability of the twelve disciples he’s sending out. When the twelve were his supporting cast, they relied on Jesus to provide the input, but now he needs them to stretch themselves and go to towns and villages two by two, without him.  That is a big “ask”.  But to ask them to do that AND to do so with people of a different religious or ethnic background than their own?... well, I think that would be asking a bit much, don’t you?  Hard for them, and probably ineffective, for I know that I am much more comfortable and effective critiquing systems I have personally lived with, naming injustices close to home, rather than guessing at the realities of contexts I do not know as well. We disciples can be much bolder and more confident in situations where we know the lay of the land, and people are more likely to respond positively if there is common ground that we share between us.

So Jesus sends the disciples only to the Jewish towns, less out of exclusivity, and more because it’s what they know; I also think that Jesus limits their mission at this point, because it is still early in their ministry.  They need to build some experience, to get some mistakes out of their system in familiar territory.  Not many months earlier, some of them spent their days out on fishing boats, talking little about anything but fish, so it would take a while for them to be confident, skilled ambassadors of God’s great big love.

As all of them – Jesus included – gained experience, they started to branch out.  Today’s reading is from the 9^th and 10^th chapters of Matthew, but by the 15^th chapter they were ministering in Gentile territory, the land of Tyre and Sidon on the Mediterranean coast.   And while Matthew does not mention it, in the gospel of Luke, there is a second sending out of disciples – this time, 72 disciples, who went into both Jewish and Gentile towns, a second wave of disciples whose territory becomes much, much broader.

When we read of the calling, commissioning and sending of disciples in scripture, that is our mission as well.  Whether we identify with the twelve disciples in today’s gospel lesson, most connecting with those we are accustomed to; or if we see ourselves a bit further down the line, more like the 72 who bring the unconditional love of Jesus into unfamiliar places, we are the spiritual heirs of those first disciples.  We are the ones commissioned in Jesus’ name to be people of unyielding love, to embody his love in the Church and in the world.

But what, specifically, is our calling as a congregation, here and now?  What, specifically, is Osoyoos United Church being equipped to do as 21^st century disciples of Jesus?

If we flip back the calendar to September 2024, you will recall that there were three questions that Shannon and I were brought here to explore with you in our time of Intentional Interim Ministry: who are we? Who are our neighbours? and, what is God calling us to?  With the leadership of Shannon and the Transition Team, you explored those questions and as you did so, some answers started to emerge. Eventually, the work you did, with some wordsmithing by yours truly, created the content for the Final Report of the Osoyoos-Oliver Transition Team, a document that will be a tremendous help in setting the agenda for your immediate future.

Now, that document is fourteen pages long, so I need to be very selective, but from that report, here is some of the mission that is before Osoyoos United Church:

I say this with love, and as a fellow senior citizen: even as a small, aging congregation, you are called to seek opportunities for evangelism.  Osoyoos has an extremely high number of retirees, so that will continue to get significant time and effort from you and your new minister, and there are demographics that appear to be underserved by the Churches in town, such as the queer community, and Spanish speakers who come here for seasonal work.  The legacy of this congregation, as people who want to open the doors to all people, equips you for that increased outreach.

You have a building that enables mission! For over fifty years, the people of the south Okanagan have come to the Osoyoos United Church Thrift Shop for high-quality, low-cost wares, and funds raised benefit numerous local charities, including the Church.  Your sanctuary, with its stage, is a great size for community events.  The church hall is appropriate for programming and, since with our upgraded commercial kitchen, can be used for meals and food security programs. 

You have a relationship with Desert Sun, which admittedly will need some work, and you will have the opportunity to use what you have learned to explore additional community partnerships.   You also have a Church Administrator who is keen at increasing your community connections and facility usage.

You get to envision what is to be done with the vacant lot to the west of the Church.  How can this be developed for the greater common good of the Osoyoos community? Your refreshed Board of Trustees has interest in pursuing such development and so does your Council.

You have a realistic picture of the road ahead, which is made possible by your diverse funding streams.  Your congregational and M&S givings are generous, but you don’t rely solely on that. There are funds and investments from a couple of sizeable bequests, and a significant contribution to your budget from the Thrift Shop.  And the ministry funded by these sources is not just inward focused; your heart is engaged in a ministry of community connection.

And just as the disciples sent out by Jesus to the towns and villages of Galilee had to be careful about some things, there are a couple of things you will need to watch out for:

·       There is a small number of shoulders carrying the weight of congregational governance, carrying multiple responsibilities, so additional people will need to step into that work. 

·       And, the gifts of hospitality and grace will be essential as the Church Hall becomes busier. Church folks, leaders and attendees of events in the hall, and volunteers, will frequently be “in each others’ space”, especially due to the single access point that is used for hall access and Thrift Shop donations….and because of this, structured communication, and patient personal interactions, will be essential. 

So back to the good news of your future calling: the final paragraph of the report says this: from the Interim Ministers’ standpoint, both of the Ministry Position Descriptions, at Osoyoos United Church and Oliver United Church, will be much more engaging than the grind of two-point ministry.   These will be interesting positions for the right candidates!  We feel that there is real potential for each congregation to really “grab hold” of their future and, with consistent ministry support, find new, enduring ways to serve God in their communities.

With the ongoing support of God, whom we know as Creator, Christ and Spirit, with your desire to be the kind of Church that reaches beyond itself to engage all manner of community need, with an openness to adapt and adjust to whatever changes may come, I pray that you will know blessings on your discipleship journey.  May this be so, Amen.  

 

References:

Davis, D. Mark. https://leftbehindandlovingit.blogspot.com/

Jackson, James. https://jamesjackson.blog/2024/10/16/why-did-jesus-send-the-disciples-only-to-the-lost-sheep-of-israel/

Stoffregen, Brian. https://www.crossmarks.com/brian/matt9x35.htm

© 2026 Rev Greg Wooley, Osoyoos-Oliver United Church Pastoral charge.

 

 

Matthew 9:35-10:14 - OLIVER - Third Sunday after Pentecost, June 14, 2026

Preached at OLIVER UNITED CHURCH

The Jesus of my understanding, is the Word of God made flesh, a person of wisdom and love and courage who repeatedly broke down social and religious barriers. In his words about love of neighbour, and his challenge for us to radically expand our understanding of “neighbour”, Jesus, pushes us to let go of our tendency to label and limit.

In today’s gospel reading, Jesus sees so many vulnerable people around him, “sheep without a shepherd”, and responds by sending out his disciples to proclaim the Kingdom of God, and heal in his name. This, to me, is consistent with the way Jesus usually responds: he sees the need, he commissions helpers to address the need.  But in the midst of the reading is a troubling question:  given his agenda of breaking down barriers, why did Jesus limit the disciples to only go to Jewish towns, not to the Gentiles or Samaritans? This seems contrary to the Jesus I know.

Theologically, the gospel writers like to hearken to Hebrew prophets like Isaiah (49:6) who made clear that the mission of the Messiah would be first to the Jewish people, so that’s part of the reason we see this narrowing of scope in the gospel of Matthew.  This shows up again in our communion prayers, when we trace a continuous “salvation history” from the days of Abraham and Sarah to the mission of Jesus. But from a practical standpoint, in limiting where his disciples are to go, I see Jesus’ compassionate recognition of the personal, spiritual and emotional vulnerability of the twelve disciples he’s sending out. When the twelve were his supporting cast, they relied on Jesus to provide the input, but now he needs them to stretch themselves and go to towns and villages two by two, without him.  That is a big “ask”.  But to ask them to do that AND to do so with people of a different religious or ethnic background than their own?... well, I think that would be asking a bit much, don’t you?  Hard for them, and probably ineffective, for I know that I am much more comfortable and effective critiquing systems I have personally lived with, naming injustices close to home, rather than guessing at the realities of contexts I do not know as well. We disciples can be much bolder and more confident in situations where we know the lay of the land, and people are more likely to respond positively if there is common ground that we share between us.

So Jesus sends the disciples only to the Jewish towns, less out of exclusivity, and more because it’s what they know; I also think that Jesus limits their mission at this point, because it is still early in their ministry.  They need to build some experience, to get some mistakes out of their system in familiar territory.  Not many months earlier, some of them spent their days out on fishing boats, talking little about anything but fish, so it would take a while for them to be confident, skilled ambassadors of God’s great big love.

As all of them – Jesus included – gained experience, they started to branch out.  Today’s reading is from the 9^th and 10^th chapters of Matthew, but by the 15^th chapter they were ministering in Gentile territory, the land of Tyre and Sidon on the Mediterranean coast.   And while Matthew does not mention it, in the gospel of Luke, there is a second sending out of disciples – this time, 72 disciples, who went into both Jewish and Gentile towns, a second wave of disciples whose territory becomes much, much broader.

When we read of the calling, commissioning and sending of disciples in scripture, that is our mission as well.  Whether we identify with the twelve disciples in today’s gospel lesson, most connecting with those we are accustomed to; or if we see ourselves a bit further down the line, more like the 72 who bring the unconditional love of Jesus into unfamiliar places, we are the spiritual heirs of those first disciples.  We are the ones commissioned in Jesus’ name to be people of unyielding love, to embody his love in the Church and in the world.

But what, specifically, is our calling as a congregation, here and now?  What, specifically, is Oliver United Church being equipped to do as 21^st century disciples of Jesus?

If we flip back the calendar to September 2024, you will recall that there were three questions that Shannon and I were brought here to explore with you in our time of Intentional Interim Ministry: who are we? Who are our neighbours? and, what is God calling us to?  With the leadership of Shannon and the Transition Team, you explored those questions and as you did so, some answers started to emerge. Eventually, the work you did, with some wordsmithing by yours truly, created the content for the Final Report of the Osoyoos-Oliver Transition Team, a document that will be a tremendous help in setting the agenda for your immediate future.

Now, that document is fourteen pages long, so I need to be very selective, but from that report, here is some of the mission that is before Oliver United Church:

A section of the report entitled, “Where we sensed life, energy, and possibility” says this: the connection with members from the St. Edward the Confessor Anglican Church, who frequently worship with the Oliver United Church congregation, is warm, friendly and authentically hopeful. Much credit goes to Rev. Marie Paul, who as a student minister at the time developed and furthered this connection. 

Once you make the move to St. Edward’s in 2027, learning how to engage in ministry in a shared space that is new to you will be a big part of what comes next.  It may take a year or two to “live into” this new relationship, and the pattern of alternating worship services, but there is a strong sense of being “better together” as you make this move.

It will be so nice to have kitchen access again, as one means of reaching out to the community.   Oliver United has a legacy of opening the doors to all people, and a kitchen will equip you for increased outreach.  And…it will be great to proclaim to the Oliver community that there is worship happening in the St. Edward’s building every Sunday! (In my mind’s eye I can see the banner now, on Fairview Drive!)

Your strong commitment to the residential care facilities in Oliver is a big part of your identity.  Three monthly outreach services in Oliver will continue to be led by the United Church team, lay people supported by clergy, as part of an ecumenical roster.  Additional members of this worship team will help to carry this substantial ministry.

It is safe to say that each congregation – Oliver United and Osoyoos United - is looking forward to having “their own” half-time minister whose attention is not split between the two communities.   Your new minister will have the opportunity for extended pastoral connection and community outreach, as well as supporting the work of settling in to your new Church home.

And just as the disciples sent out by Jesus to the towns and villages of Galilee had to be careful about some things, there are a couple of things you will need to watch out for. 

·       You have excellent lay leadership here, but it’s a small number of folks often carrying multiple responsibilities, so additional people will need to step into that work.  As with most United Church congregations these days, we aren’t a huge group, we aren’t getting any younger, but it is what it is, and many hands make light work.

·       Engaging the grief of leaving a building that had been home for over 100 years may catch you off-guard in coming months.  You have done so well at this already, when you down-sized in 2022, but it will still be hard and emotional when it is time to leave.

·       And to step outside the report for a moment, I cannot state too strongly how important it is to have even more folks sign up for Pre-Authorized Monthly donations so that the givings don’t sag.  You still have a nice amount on deposit from the Church sale, but a predictable source of congregational giving will take a lot of pressure off everyone concerned.

So back to the good news of your future calling: The final paragraph of the report says, “from the Interim Ministers’ standpoint, both of the Ministry Position Descriptions, at Osoyoos United Church and Oliver United Church, will be much more engaging than the grind of two-point ministry.   These will be interesting positions for the right candidates!  We feel that there is real potential for each congregation to really “grab hold” of their future and, with consistent ministry support, find new, enduring ways to serve God in their communities”.

With the ongoing support of God, whom we know as Creator, Christ and Spirit, with your desire to be the kind of Church that reaches beyond itself to engage all manner of community need, with an openness to adapt and adjust to whatever changes may come, I pray that you will know blessings on your discipleship journey.  May this be so, Amen.

 References:

Davis, D. Mark. https://leftbehindandlovingit.blogspot.com/

Jackson, James. https://jamesjackson.blog/2024/10/16/why-did-jesus-send-the-disciples-only-to-the-lost-sheep-of-israel/

Stoffregen, Brian. https://www.crossmarks.com/brian/matt9x35.htm

© 2026 Rev Greg Wooley, Osoyoos-Oliver United Church Pastoral charge.

 

 

Genesis 1: 1-2:4a - Trinity Sunday, May 31, 2026

 

When I was sixteen years old I was pretty sure of two things.  I figured that my career would involve science in some way, confirmed by a part-time job at a drug store where I really thrived, and I deeply enjoyed Sunday Worship and my growing involvement at Westminster United Church in Regina.

Four years later, halfway through a Pharmacy degree, in the middle of the night I had a call experience in which God called me “to minister to others.”  Whether that would be as an ordained minister, or as a pharmacist who conducted himself in helpful and ethical ways was not yet clear, but again, the worlds of science and spirit were not far apart.

I share these snippets to make clear, that for at least fifty years I have seen no conflict between the world of faith and the world of science.  I believe in the creative intent of a loving God, which makes us kin with all living beings and with this planet itself.  I also trust the scientific process, of being curious about life and the world we live in, asking questions, testing the hypothesis, seeing if results and answers can be duplicated and verified, and publishing the results so that they can in turn be scrutinized, challenged and honed.   The things we think we know about the world need to always be questioned, and so do the things we think we know about our spiritual selves. I have long believed that intellect and reason are among God’s most generous gifts to humanity, so for me, thoughtful, probing Christian Theology and the theories of Charles Darwin can coexist very nicely, thank you very much.

Unfortunately, and increasingly, science has been attacked by the Christianity of literalism and empire, and one of the typical battlegrounds is the story of creation, which we heard in its glorious entirety this morning.  Insisting that the only way to understand creation is as six chronological 24-hour days, the work of the scientific community through radiometry, carbon dating and other techniques is rejected as false and faithless.  Understandably, in response there has been unfairly generalized pushback labelling all people of faith as simple-minded and obtuse. This is so unfortunate, and so distracting, as I think it misrepresents what science really is, and misunderstands the role of our sacred text. 

I have struggled to find words that are clear enough to describe how important it is to me to both respect science, and to love the sacred story that has come to us from our forebears in faith.  In this I am indebted to Karen Armstrong, a historian of religion whose work I find to be deep, clear and brilliant, and she offers these words:

“Our culture” she writes “trains us to look for the literal truths of the words on the page. We expect a text to express its ideas as clearly as possible… we are likely to condemn a work that is deliberately vague or paradoxical or that presents mutually exclusive arguments. There are many Jews and Christians who have come to apply the same standards to the Bible. Some, for example, have argued that the first chapter of Genesis is a factual account of the beginning of life on earth: they believe that God really did make the world in six days, and that those scientists who maintain that it took billions of years to evolve must be wrong.

“What we need to understand” she continues, “is that the Bible does not present its truths to us in this way. Reading it demands the same kind of meditative and intuitive attention that we give to a poem. We often have to wrestle with the text, only to learn that we are denied the certainty of a final revelation. Genesis has been one of the sacred books that have enabled millions of men and women to know at some profound level that human life has an eternal dimension…Genesis points to a reality that must essentially transcend it.”

Karen describes perfectly what I wish to convey here.   As someone who deeply respects the integrity and wisdom of science, my soul still yearns for the poetic rhythm of these words of Genesis, not as a construction manual of how to build a planet, but as a means to come close to the God of loving, creative purpose.  Each of these six legendary days, imagining the origins of water and dry lands and people and animals, expresses that holy purpose.  I come to these words with awe and wonder.

And when I do so, I wonder how I would have explained the beginnings of all that is, if all I had was my experience: the experience of planting the seeds and harvesting the fruit, the experience of the regular return of seasons, the experience of the joy and tragedy and complexity of human relationships. If all I knew about life was from my experience, and from the experiences of my neighbours and my relations, how might I have explained the miracle of existence itself?  What words or framework would God have led me to?

When I slow down, and set aside the silly “religion vs. science” tussle, and allow these words of Genesis to draw me back to the very beginnings of time, in the narrative of my long-ago spiritual ancestors, I am gifted with the beauty of language, and mystery, and wonder.

·       I picture myself looking upward, and wondering how the clouds stay in place, and imagining a dome holding waters above from waters below.  That same dome would hold the sun and stars safely in place.

·       I imagine standing on a lakeshore, and proposing that once upon a time water and sea were just mixed up in a sort of slurry, then the waters all came together, leaving dry land.

·       I recall how from I have since childhood been amazed at how shrubs and trees and seedbearing plants propagate themselves with no assistance from any human hands, and I cannot help but imagine a creator whose hands were initially involved.

·       I consider the diversity of birds and fish and mammals, how thrilling it is to see and hear a new one for the first time, and how fearful and activated I can be when I do not know their intent.

·       And I give thanks for this first account of creation, which describes humans, both male and female, equally bearing the image of God, and carrying the tasks of being God’s own stewards of all of this.   

Throughout this sacred text of origins, I notice that seven times we are told that God paused to observe what had just been made, and it was good. Not just okay, but good.  Godly good. And we also note that the reward of six days of creativity was a day of sabbath rest.  Even God gets to be satisfied in a job well done, and lay back and do nothin’.

Do I need this reading to function as a textbook, as if I were watching a YouTube video showing me sequentially, with timings, how to build my own heaven and earth?  No, I really don’t, any more than I would benefit from dismantling song lyrics that move me to tears each time I hear them, for to me, the story of creation is very much the love song of Creator God. I need those recurring words, “God saw that it was good” to seep into my very being, to renew my awe and wonder and love at the gift of life and the gift of the planet on which life is lived, even as I celebrate the scientific curiosity that helps us learn more and more about the miracle of life, and which warns us of the dangers of taking the earth for granted.   The slow, methodical presentation of the first chapter of Genesis truly helps me to “let go and let God”, to reframe each day as “gift” rather than “problem” and rest in the love of the Creator.

And with that, this message draws to a close with words from Karen Armstrong, as she writes about the first chapter of Genesis:

“This masterly account…emphasizes the purposefulness of God's creativity…. Key words are repeated throughout the chapter. God ‘said,’ ‘saw,’ ‘separated,’ and ‘called.’ The stately rhythm and repetition make us feel that events are following a serenely ordained pattern. Similarly, God's pronouncement that each stage of his creation is ‘good’ emphasizes the excellence, rightness, and wholesomeness of the universe. This God is not only powerful but completely benevolent. The structure of the text rises to a crescendo: the author devotes more time and space to each successive day.

“At the end of the creative process”, Karen Armstrong concludes, “God, having expended no effort, was not exhausted by these labors. God brought his work to an end, and on the seventh day rested and contemplated his creation in rather the same way as a craftsman surveys the work of his hands….God is in his heaven and all is right with the world”.

May our relationship with all that we know, all that we believe, all that causes us to worry and all that brings us hope, be truly spacious.  May we have the room in our lives, in the Church, and in the world, to engage the glories of our sacred story and the amazing discoveries of science, even amidst the anti-intellectual leanings of some of the world’s most powerful regimes. May we love this planet, our human neighbours, and all living beings, knowing that through God we are all part of one beloved realm. May the refrain “it is good” – God’s own assessment of all of it - be enough for us on this sabbath day.  Amen.

Reference cited:

Armstrong, Karen. In the beginning: a new interpretation of Genesis.  NYC: Knopf, 1996.  See especially pp. 9-12. 

© 2026 Rev Greg Wooley, Osoyoos-Oliver United Church Pastoral Charge.

1 Corinthians 12: 4-14 - Pentecost Sunday, May 24, 2026

 

The 2^nd chapter of Acts, read each year on Pentecost Sunday, tells us of the day when the Holy Spirit descended on a group of Galileans who had come to Jerusalem for the festival of Shavuot, a group who were Jews by birth and followers of Jesus by inclination.  The power of the moment is described as wind and flame, and they began to speak languages unknown to them, recognized by people who had come to Jerusalem. This weird, powerful, ecstatic event, the day of the first Christian Pentecost, is remembered as the day when the Church was born.  

This year, however, my preaching text for Pentecost Sunday is not the 2^nd chapter of Acts, but the reading from First Corinthians 12 which we read as today’s Call to Worship. 

If we envision that first Christian Pentecost, we picture all the believers simultaneously receiving an outpouring of the same Holy Spirit; but clearly, the gift didn't land the same for all of them, nor should we expect it would. For each one, then in Jerusalem and here, now, would have different spiritual and personal backgrounds, experiences, strengths and shortfalls, preferences, gifts, skills and aptitudes; and – just as Jesus did with the twelve disciples – at Pentecost, God happily worked with whatever those believers brought with them.  There is at one and the same time unity in the Spirit, and diversity in the believers.

This is one of the many beautiful aspects of how God has made us.  We are not all wired the same, especially in the way we respond to God.  In 1^st Corinthians 12 the Apostle Paul validates all of the spiritual gifts given by the Spirit and expressed by believers, and encourages us as Church to build up one another, honouring it all. Taken together, all these gifts and the way we express them make the body of Christ stronger: stronger in love, and stronger in service.

But by the time Paul was writing to the Corinthian Church, roughly twenty to thirty years after that day of Pentecost, it is clear that they had stopped honouring all of the gifts. Pridefulness had arisen, especially among those who had the ecstatic gifts of divining spirits, speaking in tongues or interpreting tongues, and Paul challenges that hierarchy by placing these most highly prized of all the gifts at the tail end of the list.  He doesn’t say that the gifts are illegitimate, but he wants to undercut their pridefulness in their gifts by asking: what does this gift do to build up the body of Christ, to build up the common good?  The gifts of the spirit, argues Paul, are to be tools of love that help the Church lift up those who are discouraged or demeaned or fearful or judged or impoverished, not prideful possessions.

In Paul’s list, we recognize some elements of Church life that are timeless:  knowledge, wisdom, faith, healing.  Less familiar to us are the gifts of prophecy, miracles, divination, tongues and interpretations.  In other lists, Paul adds additional qualities like generosity, hospitality and kindness, and roles like teaching and leading.  By presenting all these ways in which Spirit is expressed, Paul wants to encourage Church people as we respond in many different life-giving ways. Paul calls us back to the truth that there is one God, one Christ, one Spirit, but many gifted responses.

As these congregations in Osoyoos and Oliver move into separate callings, starting on July 1^st it will be particularly important to truly celebrate all the different ways we respond to God’s calling, rather than getting frustrated by people whose ways of responding to God may not align with our own.  As United Church folks and Anglican folks in Oliver learn how to be together at St. Edward’s, that will be extremely important, and it will also be important in Osoyoos, as you reach out to parts of the community you may not be all that familiar with, and supportively welcome and work alongside social service agencies you are just getting to know.  And with that, I turn my attention once more to Janet Gear’s “Theological Banquet”, which describes the various ways that Mainline Canadian Christians tend to respond to God’s gracious calling.   

Remember, none of the place settings is the “right” or the “best” – these are categories based on observation, to help us understand our own responses, and those expressed by others.

So, in a typical congregation there will be people in the yellow “evangelical” category, who have experienced God’s transformative love turn their lives upside down in the best possible way, and they are just bursting to tell people about that.  Those at the evangelical place setting may have had a “born-again” experience, or their new life may have come through sobriety and twelve-step support and a loving Church home.  “Evangel” means “good news” and for the evangelical group, it’s good news that just has to be shared.  

“Ecclesia” means “the assembly of the faithful”, and for the ecclesials the things we do together as Church comprise a huge part of their response to God’s calling.  That includes what we do on Sunday: worshiping together, sharing the sacraments, passing the peace, teaching Sunday School, connecting over coffee. Many mid-week study groups fit here as well, and so do the commitments made by committee and Council members.

The purple, Missional category, is the category of practical Christian service.  Offering hospitality, raising funds for good causes, working in the Thrift Shop or serving community meals, are all part of this familiar category.  Missionals desire to put their faith into tangible, hands-on assistance.  This place-setting is practical, pragmatic, motivated by need. The phrase “we are the hands and feet of Christ” fits this group.

Next is the blue category, the category of Social Justice.  While Janet calls it “ecumenical”, based on the Greek word “Oikumene” which alludes to the issues of the entire world, in my experience ecumenical always means inter-church, which sometimes works for social justice but often struggles to do so.  In any case, the social justice folks at this place setting are moved by the withholding of civil rights, and social inequity, and global suffering, and seek to respond in faith through social justice actions such as advocacy, resistance, solidarity, education and communication.   

And there is the green, “spiritual” place at the table.  This is the place of contemplation and prayer, and this may be a place where we meet people from other religious traditions, or young people seeking meaning without dogma, or people who are moved by the rhythms of the natural world.  The Spiritual place at the table includes contemplative traditions that meets God’s energy in art and beauty, in poetry and song, in prayer, in nature, and in silence. The green place setting is a place of awe and wonder and peace.

My hope is that these five place settings at the banquet will pique your curiosity.  The world is full of injustice, and our social justice folks can reach into that. The world is full of need, and our missional folks are equipped to respond.  The world is filled with emptiness and bad news, and the sharing of the Evangel of Jesus Christ is a wonderful response to that.  And to be equipped, the Church needs those who meet God in the silence of the spirituals, and in the gatherings of the ecclesial faithful.

When the Holy Spirit came to the Church, God knew full well that the gift was being given to a whole range of people who would be inspired in many different ways, and while that can at times be chaotic it can also be indescribably beautiful.  Whether you’re hearing the words of Paul talking about spiritual gifts, or the image he goes on to use about the different parts of the body working together, or Janet Gear’s image of the theological banquet, on this day of Pentecost we celebrate our unity in God’s love and the rich diversity of responses.

This Pentecost, then, we consider the goodness of the gift, and the glorious diversity of human response, and as we prepare to receive bread and cup at the table of Jesus, we pray that the banqueting table of this congregation will be rich and varied and filled with new ways of being, in the years God still has in front of you. Amen.

For further reading:

Gear, Janet. https://www.leadershiftpm.ca/the-theological-banquet

Gear, Janet. Undivided Love. © 2022. https://books.friesenpress.com/store/title/119734000231789479/Janet-Gear-Undivided-Love

“Spiritual Gifts” - https://www.gotquestions.org/spiritual-gifts-list.html

© 2026 Rev Greg Wooley, Osoyoos-Oliver United Church Pastoral Charge

 

Acts 17: 22-31

Imagine with me, being in Athens, 2000 years ago.

For those who have actually visited Athens, that’s probably not a hard thing to do, while for those like me who know Athens only from grade 6 social studies, it takes a bit more imagination.

The Apostle Paul had the task of spreading the good news of Jesus Christ to the Gentiles and now he has arrived in Athens, the centre of Greek culture.  As a Jew, Paul had grown up with a strict prohibition against idols of any sort, yet here he was in Athens, a city which honoured forty or more deities.  At first, it was “distressing” (Acts 17:16) for Paul to be surrounded by idols as idolatry stood directly in the face of the second commandment, which prohibited bowing down to graven images or even making them.  Yet at another level he couldn’t help but be impressed at how “religious” this place was. Even if the Greek beliefs were very different from his own, it was hard to go to Athens and just be offended.  

In the midst of idols to Athena and Zeus and Poseidon was an idol with the inscription, either “to an unknown God” or “to the unknown God.”  The Oxford Dictionary of the Bible puts it this way: “Although such an altar has not been found [in Athens] by archaeologists, inscriptions are known of altars [elsewhere] dedicated 'to unknown gods'. The reasoning was that one or other of the gods might show anger at having been overlooked. Such an inscription was designed to cover all contingencies”.

The oddness of this is striking: amidst all the specifically named idols, an idol to an UNKNOWN GOD, sort of a safety-net idol to appease any deities that may have gotten overlooked.  And so, in our imaginary tour of ancient Athens, we pause at this unusual monument and ask what Paul’s experience in Athens has to say to us in our time and place.

At first, I admit that I’m a bit amused by an idol with a question mark on it – but there is something both familiar and disheartening about a monument to an unknown deity.  For the fact of the matter is that in the year 2026, many communities in the northern hemisphere could truthfully have a billboard, plaque or building with this same inscription on it: “dedicated to an unknown God”.  The news keeps us apprised of the actions of religious extremists of all sorts, including Christian, who focus hatred in the name of the God of their understanding on those who are least able to defend themselves; but outside of that, to huge swaths of our population, God is completely unknown.  And in many corners of social media, anyone who speaks of God is mocked and eagerly dismissed, this notion of God a childish folly practiced by the deluded.  Recent figures indicate that some 35% of Canadians identify themselves as having “no religion,” and that number goes above 65% in places like Estonia and the Czech Republic.

Some of this is entirely of our own making.  Wars of religious origin push the entire world to think twice about the whole concept of God and religion. Hatred against the 2SLGBTQIA+ community, active limitation of a woman’s agency over her own body, the banning of books that encourage an open mind, are all actions inexplicably undertaken by religious folk in the name of God and happily publicized as if this what a true Christian should think.  Actions of cultural genocide, including the Residential Schools, generate shame that we will need to deal with for a very long time.  The Church, I’m afraid, has made it easy for God to be unknown in this time and place.

But it’s not that simple. In the forty-five years since I preached my first sermon, I have seen a steady increase in western Canada of people whose ancestors had identified as Christian for centuries, who now have no knowledge of the faith and no Christian memory, because neither they, nor their parents nor their grandparents had a Church connection.  My brother’s family falls into that category: he was a preacher’s kid in the 1950s and absolutely hated the judgmental expectations, so his kids were raised with no knowledge of Christianity except that the Church was narrow-minded and limiting, and then when they had kids, the whole “religion” thing didn’t even warrant a mention.   That’s a really common phenomenon in Canada and it has been happening since 1965, when Church involvement started its steady downward slide. Add to that other factors –Sunday shopping and sports, growing secularization, the un-cool factor attached to mainline Christianity, as well as the hateful things said by some Christian leaders, a statue with the inscription “to the unknown God” fits the bill.

But there is good news to be found as we seek present day connections. Paul used the idol “to an unknown God” as a door-opener, acknowledging how important religion was to the Athenians, then speaking of the God who was anything but unknown to him: God the creator, God the source of wisdom and dignity, God made known in the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Some of his points were accepted, others were ridiculed, but it’s the way he presented it that impresses me.  Paul met the people where they were; he presented his beliefs clearly and rationally, without demonizing their beliefs. Rather than the “I’m right, you’re wrong” attitude that has marred so many religious interactions, Paul found a way into religious dialogue by respecting what was there as a starting point.

This approach is so important, right now, for mainline Christian Churches that hope to have a future: meeting people where they are, whether they are folks who used to be Church-involved but are now burnt out or wounded by the experience; folks who have no Christian memory; or folks of completely different cultural or religious backgrounds, who have religious leanings of a totally different shape. 

A case in point: thirty years ago, I served a New Church Development congregation in north Calgary, who had recently constructed a functional little Church building.  The main room in the Church, our Sunday morning sanctuary, was a bland multi-purpose room with no Christian symbols displayed. That was done on purpose, as there was a school of thought in the early ‘90s that putting up a cross or anything like that would turn people off.  In particular, there was a large Asian population in the area, many of whom were Muslim or Buddhist, and nobody wanted to cause offence when that space was used for voting, or community meetings, or rummage sales.  

But there was a space up high in the room just begging to have a cross put in it, and eventually I asked a woodworker in our Church family to hand-craft and install one.  And within ten days of installing the cross (ten days!) we got a phone call from a local Muslim group, asking if they might perhaps be able to do their Ramadan observances in our Church building.  To this day, I believe that it was our willingness to claim our faith that signalled to neighbours of different beliefs, that religion is something that mattered to us, as it mattered to them. When we installed the cross our sanctuary changed from being a room dedicated “to an unknown God”, to saying, like St. Paul did, “you and I know about God in different ways, let’s talk about it.”

Now, if I wanted to I could keep circling this block, finding one example after another of how the society we live in does not know God, of know God in vastly different ways.  But the inscription, “to an unknown God” is challenging in a good and very personal way, bordering on inspirational, because it pushes me to say, “well, how do I know God?  What does it mean to say I know God, given that God is by definition beyond my ability to really know or understand?

For me, much of the answer, is that we have a history with God, we know what it is to feel existential love, we have experienced freeing grace, we know how it feels to do something just and loving in Jesus’ name.  We cannot claim complete clarity and knowledge when it comes to God, nobody can, but we can identify those holy moments and blessed relationships where God is made known.

In Paul’s letter to the Colossians (1:15), he wrote that Jesus Christ is ‘the image of the invisible God.’  If we think back to the nativity stories, Jesus is known as “Emmanuel, God-with-us”, his birth a pivotal moment when God says to us, “I’m not going to leave you stranded and isolated, wondering how you could possibly know me; I’m going to live your life, experience the emotions you experience, and show you what it means to love one another even when you are despised or betrayed”.  As the one bearing the image of God, Jesus discloses what God is like; he is, for Christians, the decisive revelation of what God is like.  This need not imply that Jesus is the only manifestation of God, but for Christians, it does mean that in Christ Jesus, the person of God who lived, and died, and lives again, God ceases to be “unknown” or “unknowable.”

In the good news of Jesus Christ – his preaching, his embodied commitment to healing, his repeated demonstrations of love without measure – we experience that God is love.  And I, personally, have found that when I acknowledge that I am embraced by love, and attempt to live my life like Jesus, expecting to encounter God through love, then I will encounter God.  And that opens us to see God all around us:

We encounter God in the amazing presence of an infant, who has absolutely no barriers between herself and those who love her.  In the wide-eyed expectancy between a little one and her mother, we are reminded of what it means to completely trust in the loving gaze of our God.

We encounter God when people roll up their sleeves for a cause, whether the cause is homelessness, or hunger, or safe haven for refugees, or true welcome of the queer community.  (A shout-out here to my spouse who is a particularly fierce “Mama Bear”, as many moms of trans kids are).  We encounter God when people change their behaviour to be more loving.  We encounter God when people intentionally choose a path that serves others, rather than being motivated by their own greed. 

We encounter God in the living, breathing organism we call Mother earth.  In the rhythms of growth and decay, in the rain, in the enlivening power of a hot summer day or freshening breeze, in the interplay between waterway and soil and plant and creature, we feel God’s creative love in action.  As we anticipate another year in the orchards and the vineyards, God is known.

We encounter God in moments of prayer when we become completely quiet, shutting off the constant stream of thoughts and distractions in favour of her gift of silence.  And we can even encounter God in the holiness of death.  When this life reaches its end, and thankfulness is expressed, and gratitude is shared, and reconciliation can be found, God is there.

To quote the Apostle Paul once more, “in God we live and move and have our being.”  The God in whom we live our lives holds us in creativity and love, wisdom and justice and kindness all at once, and that guides us as we engage others in their sacred journeys.  It is a blessing to be on these paths, sometimes converging, sometimes diverging, sometimes criss-crossing, as we together with one another and together with all living beings embrace God’s amazing gift of life.  While I can understand the sentiment of “an unknown God” I am so thankful for the ways that God bridges that gap, to be known to us, and fill our lives with love. Thanks be to God. Amen.

References cited:

Oxford Dictionary of the Bible: available as an app on Google Play!. 

Smit, Jana Louise. https://historycooperative.org/greek-gods-and-goddesses/

Theoi Project. https://www.theoi.com/

Turcan, Robert. https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/agnostos-theos#:~:text=The%20phrase%20agn%C5%8Dst,were%20unknown%20but%20who%20just

Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_irreligion

© 2026 Rev Greg Wooley, Osoyoos-Oliver United Church Pastoral Charge.

John 21: 12-17 and Psalm 23 - Sunday, April 26, 2026

 

Just before I start, I need to set the stage.  Today’s sermon is not set in a general “somewhere”; this one is situated in a particular place.  So imagine with me the risen Christ, and some of his disciples, sharing breakfast on the rocky beach near Tabgha, in Galilee.  In this place, Jesus had walked and talked with the disciples and now the risen Christ and Simon Peter have some one-on-one time, talking about Peter’s role in the future. 

a sermon preached at Osoyoos United Church, April 26, 2026

It is so hard to come back, when you have really messed something up.  Not just made a blooper-reel mistake, but made a choice that impacted someone else’s life… or said things that have fractured a relationship… or completely missed something that you really should have responded to, conveying a lack of friendship or caring to someone else.

In today’s gospel reading, Peter is in such a position relative to Jesus.  Peter, who had been so bold throughout their time together, had suddenly turned timid in the final week of Jesus’ life.  Although I can’t for the life of me imagine what difference it would have made to Jesus’ fate, all four gospels want us to know that three times Peter had the opportunity to proclaim that he was a follower of Jesus; and three times he lied, disowned Jesus, denied any knowledge of the man.

Knowing this failure of nerve, let us hear once more the exchange at the beach of Tabgha between the Risen Christ, and Peter:

¹⁵ When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, “Simon son of John, do you love me more than these?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord; you know that I love you.” Jesus said to him, “Feed my lambs.” ¹⁶ A second time he said to him, “Simon son of John, do you love me?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord; you know that I love you.” Jesus said to him, “Tend my sheep.” ¹⁷ He said to him the third time, “Simon son of John, do you love me?” Peter felt hurt because he said to him the third time, “Do you love me?” And he said to him, “Lord, you know everything; you know that I love you.” Jesus said to him, “Feed my sheep. 

Is there perhaps a connection, between Peter denying Jesus three times, and Christ repeating this question three times? Bible commentators over the aeons answer a hearty “yes”: three denials need to be countered by three affirmations.  Christ forgives Peter, Christ has something big for him to do, yet there is a sense that the wounded relationship between them has not completely healed.  Reconciliation is not easy.  Recovering from faithless words or actions is not easy.  Forgive and forget is a lovely saying, but does not often describe the human condition.

In a blog post, Pastor Steve Oliver points out a simple but noteworthy thing in this scripture:  in their early days together it was Jesus who gave the disciple Simon a new name:  Peter, which means, “the rock.”  Simon Peter was his foundational guy, the rock (Matthew 16:18) upon which the Church would be built.  But in this beautiful post-resurrection scene of Christ and his friends sharing breakfast on the beach, Christ does not address him as Peter-the-Rock; he rolls it back, and calls him Simon, Simon-the-fisherman.  Maybe it’s just me, but if I were Peter I think that hearing Christ abandon that new name, a name expressing confidence in him, and going back to his old name, his “deadname”, might well have stung more than being asked the same question three times.

There is in this encounter, another word swap.  The first two times Jesus asks Peter, “do you love me?” he uses the Aramaic equivalent of the word AGAPE to describe the kind of love he is talking about, and Peter answers with a different word for love, the Aramaic equivalent of PHILEO.  As described by Huffington Post contributor Gary Edmonds, agape, the love word Jesus spoke, “is not based on merit of the person loved, but [is] unconditional,…kind and generous. It continues to give even when the other is unkind, unresponsive and unworthy. It only desires good things for the other and is compassionate”.  Agape is the selfless love of service, a full-on sacrificial love offered for the benefit of another. The word that Peter uses in reply, however – Philéo – is what we might call brotherly love, or friendship.  There’s nothing wrong with phileo, we all need friends, but what Peter is offering is way below what Christ was asking him for.

So after two times of asking if Peter will be self-giving and Peter saying he’ll be fraternal, the third time, Christ relents and uses the same word Peter had been using. It’s as if he realizes that he’s not going to get agape out of Peter, so phileo will do.  J.B. Phillips, in his New Testament translation, follows this line of logic, with Jesus twice asking, “do you love me” and Peter answering “yes, I am your friend”; the third time Jesus asks, “are you my friend” and, according to Phillips, Peter is hurt, not because he’s been asked the same question three times, but because Jesus let go of his hope that Peter might be capable of that higher Christian love, agape.

We see here, that even in this foundational relationship, which was such a force during the earthly ministry of Jesus, things can go sour. Sour, but not beyond recovery.  Jesus did what Jesus always does – then, and now: he provides a path forward.  No, things weren’t like they used to be. Christ didn’t call him Rocky anymore, and when asked to love without reserve, Simon Peter could only muster friendship – but that didn’t end his friendship with Jesus,.  And while Peter’s response to Christ may have been underwhelming in the moment, he did become that rock on which the Church was built. This, to me, is what the reconciling love of Jesus looks like: it owns the truth of what has gone before, and in light of that truth, finds a path. Sometimes there is no safe path forward, especially when there has been abuse, but there are so many other times when factors like embarrassment and anger and resentment and ego and fatigue block the gracious actions of the Holy Spirit, and if we can get past those things, we needn’t remain stuck in the same place forever.   

This ability to find a pivotal future for Simon Peter, is traditionally known as “the restoration of Peter.” [this stone Church in Galilee is named for it]. Here, Christ establishes with him a fresh start, the kind of fresh start that many of us have relied on repeatedly in our family relationships, the kind of repentance-based hope we turn to as the Church as we do the work of reconciliation with First Nations peoples.   Three times Peter denied, three times he failed to grab hold of the invitation by Jesus to love with all his heart, soul, mind and strength, yet Jesus would not take no for an answer.

Consistently, repeatedly, in their time spent together at Galilee, Jesus focused the attention of the disciples on those in their midst who were most vulnerable: those who were held captive by harmful social conventions, by lifelong infirmity, or by unjust financial structures, and Jesus implored his followers to be people of God’s liberating love.  Often, Jesus had to repeat himself as the disciples – especially as portrayed in Mark’s gospel – are not the brightest bulbs in the package, but these were the people he had chosen to bring healing and wholeness to those in need.

In this, Jesus aligns himself and his disciples with the long-standing religious tradition of portraying spiritual leaders – and, at times, God – as shepherds who would keep the vulnerable little lambs out of harm’s way.   He’s naming a reality in his world and ours, that the forces of inequality intentionally create very precarious conditions in some people’s lives, people whose lives are already shaky. Like sheep who need a shepherd to make sure they don’t tumble down a cliff, or to protect them from wolves, Jesus recognizes that there are particularly vulnerable ones in this world who need to be noticed and loved and attended to.  While the 21^st chapter of John was talking only about people, in the industrialized world we live in, I think Christ would include the soil, the water, the atmosphere, endangered plants and creatures, in the list of those at peril because of human greed.   And in relationship to these vulnerable ones, Christ says to Simon Peter, “Feed my lambs, Shepherd my sheep, feed my sheep.”  Love the vulnerable ones.   Guard them, help them find safety, establish justice, don’t completely ruin this planet, remember that every person and, in fact, every living being is beloved in the eyes of the Creator.  

When we think back to the social status of a shepherd in the days of Jesus, we may remember just how low a position it was.  Some ancient sources suggest that the testimony of a shepherd was not allowable in court, so low was the common opinion of them, and even more than that: in the economy of the day, the value of a sheep was probably higher than the value of a shepherd.  So when Christ commands Simon Peter to be a shepherd to the sheep, this is not a high-status proposition; it was a call to service.  Just as God, the good shepherd, was said to be present even in the valley of the shadow of death, even when we are surrounded by enemies, so Peter and those following after him in Christ’s name were to put themselves on the line.  And no, not just pastors or priests or ministers, though Peter is regarded as the first Pope; this is what Christ expects of all who claim to be disciples, all communities of faith bearing his name, all who have heard in the brave, reconciling words of Jesus the distinctive ring of truth.   Christ has a special affinity for all who are imperiled, and those of us who bear his light in the world are called to deep, non-judgmental service: practical, personal, and yes, even political. 

As we gather this morning, as disciples of Christ Jesus, we imagine the relationship between Jesus Christ and Simon Peter, and its rhythm from reliability, to doubt, to reconciliation and new possibility; and as we do so, we go deep in our own experience: our places of brokenness, our gratitude for healing, the places where we have work to do.  We see in this primary relationship between Jesus and his right-hand man, Peter, that even when we miss the mark there is the opportunity to be restored.  At this time when we seek new horizons in the name of Jesus, may all this be so, in the unfolding of your lives, and our life together.  Amen.  

References cited:

Edmonds, Gary. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/agape-and-phileo-love-we-need-both_b_58a1e5d6e4b0cd37efcfeb23

Jarrett, Ed. https://www.christianity.com/wiki/jesus-christ/what-did-jesus-mean-when-he-said-take-care-of-my-sheep.html

Oliver, Steve. https://holyjoys.org/restoring-the-fallen-peters-restoration-john-211-19/

Phillips, JB. The New Testament in Modern English. © 1958.

 © 2026, Rev Greg Wooley, Osoyoos-Oliver United Church Pastoral Charge.