Before I say anything specific about the difficult words of today’s gospel reading, I want to say four things about the Jesus of my understanding:
· Jesus Christ is love incarnate. In his words and deeds, the cuddly ones and
the challenging ones, we see what it is to be a person infused in God’s own love.
· The way of Jesus is the way of peace; peace,
understood through the Jewish concept of shalom which is typified by such words
as harmony, wholeness, tranquility, dignity.
· From his life experience, Jesus understands power, and
I trust what he says about it; as a Jew living under Roman rule, he lived under
oppression and in his path to the cross he experienced what happens when power
is abused. In the face of all that, Jesus chooses the healing power of love.
· The grace of Christ Jesus opens us to new life by the
power of forgiveness, a forgiveness which still involves accountability,
repentance and restitution.
I lead with these four
points, and will leave them on screen throughout today’s message, because they
remind us of the loving heart of Jesus and the passion that Jesus has for those
who have been mistreated. I also recognize that in every congregation
there are folks who live with the after-effects of trauma, and that needs to
inform how I approach our reading from the gospel of Luke. In leaving these words on screen about Jesus,
our loving, empowering saviour, I hope that everything I say from here on in
will be understood within the embrace of his abounding love.
Theologian Dale C. Allison wrote
a book entitled, The Sermon on the Mount: Inspiring the Moral Imagination. That subtitle, “inspiring the moral
imagination” is a great description of what Jesus was attempting to do in his
very first sermon to his gathered disciples, his opportunity to set the tone
for everything to come. Rather than
developing a new form of legalism, in which he defines rules for our lives and
then punishes disobedience, Jesus assumes that those who came to him were
yearning for something new, uplifting and life-changing. In answer to that
yearning, Jesus engaged their imaginations: he invited them to imagine with him
a new realm, the Kingdom or Kin-dom of God, a world made new where everything
is answerable to love. To spur their
creativity, Jesus said,
“Love
your enemies; do good to those who hate you; bless those who curse you; pray
for those who mistreat you. If anyone strikes you on the cheek, offer the other
also”
Love and pray for your
enemies, says Jesus – turn the other cheek. These
words may sound foolhardy, but these are not words of naivete, or a worldview
through rose coloured glasses; they were spoken by one who knew what it was
like to be on the receiving end of hatred.
As such, we can be confident that Jesus would never recommend a system
that rewards the oppressor; Jesus would never tell someone who is already in a
vulnerable position to do nothing to keep themselves safe. Jesus, the Prince of Peace, a peace based in
justice, wholeness and lovingkindness would have none of that. Yes, in the centuries
since Jesus, overlords and abusers have coopted these words to further
disempower those whom they mistreated, but the way of Jesus draws us away from elevating
the power of hatred, proposing instead a sacred path of reconciling love.
Love and pray for your
enemies; turn the other cheek. Hard words, yes, but let’s hold them not as a
rulebook with a “do this or else” attached to them, but as words intended to inspire
our moral imagination. These are words
in which Jesus invites us, in these days when each day brings new shapes of aggression
from the new governing regime in the US, to envision our Church and our households
as what Meg Wheatley calls “islands of sanity:” places where the human spirit can
live and thrive, even in the midst of toxicity. Jesus invites us, not to ignore
the danger or stay silent, but to reject the lure to respond to hatred with
hatred, aggression with aggression, spite with spite. Friends, what would it be
like, if we as individuals and as Church, could retain the fullness of love
amidst this hot mess, even while standing firm against its dangers?
Psychologist Carl Rogers, in
the mid 1950s, developed the concept of “Unconditional Positive Regard”, in
which I step away from my anger and judgmental feelings toward those who really
push my buttons and choose, instead, to hold them in love. To me, this is the
love that Jesus calls me to have for others, even those who have named me as
enemy. This doesn’t mean their words and
actions go unchallenged, and I will never put myself into unsafe situations
with them, ever, but it does push me to dig beneath my immediate knee-jerk emotional
responses, and envision instead the core of my being interacting with the core
of their being; an interaction which is respectful, fair-minded, even loving. Whether it’s an infuriating public figure, or
someone who has been your personal nemesis over the years, the goal is the
same. We’re not going to be on each other’s
Christmas card lists, but Jesus invites us to choose a positive (or at least neutral)
emotional response.
As I consider “love your
enemies”, I think I can get there. If I have to. I guess. But when
it comes to “turning the other cheek” well, that seems dangerous and an awful
lot harder.
One thing that needs to be
dealt with in order to even engage these difficult words of Jesus, is the
frequently quoted words of Deuteronomy 19, “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a
tooth.” In their historical context, “an
eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” was a way for the Jewish Law to say, “when
someone harms you, your retribution can only be equal to the wrong, you are not
allowed to accelerate things by taking extra punishment”. That may not sound progressive, but it was in
its day: rather than upping the ante each time you were wronged, you could only
get even, rather than increasing the violence by taking a punitive bonus. Jesus then
goes one step beyond Deuteronomy and invites us to imagine and co-create with
him a world in which the cycle of violence ends. We see moves in this direction in practices of
restorative justice in parts of Canada, particularly in Indigenous settings, with
a goal of rebuilt relationships, rather than punishment; this encourages me to
believe that new ways are possible. The non-violent
pattern of Jesus is the way of the Kin-dom of God, the place where Shalom
unfolds in all its beauty.
As he moves us beyond
retributive justice, Jesus is not intending that his followers just absorb suffering,
and he is definitely not saying we just stand back as someone else is mistreated. What Jesus draws his followers away from, is
the easy slide into a life in which the thing that motivates us to get up in
the morning, is lingering hatred. In the
words of Malachy McCourt, “Resentment is like taking poison and waiting for the
other person to die.” Jesus invites us
to a new way of being, a much better future than that.
Resentment, getting even,
allowing my anger to be satisfied, these are things Jesus calls us away from. Jesus calls us to forgive one another, even as
we rely on God’s forgiving grace in our lives, but this does not cancel the
importance of accountability. Years ago,
I read a story by an evangelical Christian author, who told the story of her
family being abandoned by her father when she was quite young, and the
struggles that ensued. Decades later,
Dad came waltzing back into her life, seeking forgiveness. Yes, she said to him, by the grace of Christ
she forgave him; she released him from her anger, but she did not trust him or
feel safe around him, and her forgiveness did not release him from
accountability. Saying that she forgave him was one thing, but his saying sorry
wasn’t going to change the life-altering changes that his wife and kids experienced
when he walked out on them. Even in the
realm of “turn the other cheek,” my friends, there are boundaries. Actions have consequences in our human
relationships, even in a world of forgiveness.
Which brings me to a specific
example which we’ve been dealing with behind the scenes in our worship planning.
You may have noticed that we stopped using a sung Lord’s Prayer that was used
here for many years, and are starting to test-drive some other versions with
hopes of finding a new favourite. The reason for leaving the previous version
and seeking a new one, is that four years ago it came to light that the
composer of the previous musical setting had for decades sexually abused dozens
of young women and girls, and his music workshops were a significant venue for
this grooming. As a result, we are joining
with many congregations and his music publisher in not using his music. This
both is to let the women who have brought these complaints – very few of whom
have received apologies of any sort - know that they have been believed, and because
each usage of this song puts a few pennies of royalty money into the perpetrator’s
pockets. So I ask myself: can I find it
in myself to hold this man’s life in unconditional high regard? Yes. Do I believe that his earnest confession will
be heard by God? Yes. But even with
those two yes’s, are there consequences to his reprehensible actions? Also yes.
The words of Jesus about love and forgiveness are not intended to give carte
blanche to those who repeatedly make others’ lives a misery.
Throughout my words this
morning, I hope the words on screen have helped to place the things I’ve been
sharing within the things we know about Jesus:
•
Jesus Christ is
love incarnate.
•
The way of Jesus
is the way of peace.
•
Jesus knows how
power works, and chooses the healing power of love.
•
The grace of
Christ invites forgiveness…and accountability.
In his difficult invitation
to love and pray for our enemies, and turn the other cheek, Jesus invites us to
new life, a life with him in which we imagine the power of love surpassing all
the hate-filled nonsense presently filling our world. Jesus frees us, if we choose to accept the
gift, from a baseline hatred which only perpetuates and intensifies the brokenness.
Christ Jesus invites us to engage our creative
imaginations in the pursuit of new realm of shalom, to put away hatred and
mean-spiritedness as we welcome his love-based ethic into our interactions.
When we let love be our guide, we say yes to Christ’s glorious vision, and life
truly comes alive. May this be so, Amen.
References
cited/consulted:
Allison, Dale C. The
Sermon on the Mount: Inspiring the Moral Imagination. NYC: Crossroad, 1999.
Anderson, Amy Rees. https://www.forbes.com/sites/amyanderson/2015/04/07/resentment-is-like-taking-poison-and-waiting-for-the-other-person-to-die/
Government of Canada. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/jr/gladue/p4.html
Palmer, Rodney A. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5292&context=pubs
Ravitzky, Aviezer. https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/shalom/
Rousselle, Christine. https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/248588/new-allegations-against-david-haas-prompt-top-music-publisher-to-sever-ties-with-hymn-composer
Wheatley, Margaret. https://margaretwheatley.com/books/restoring-sanity/
Wikipedia. “Unconditional Positive Regard » https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unconditional_positive_regard#:~:text=Unconditional%20positive%20regard%2C%20a%20concept,context%20of%20client%2Dcentred%20therapy.
© 2025 Rev Greg Wooley,
Osoyoos-Oliver United Church Pastoral Charge.